The article explores the complexities of the term "reconciliation" in Syria, which has come to be associated with negative connotations such as surrender and betrayal. It argues against abandoning this term despite its skepticism and critiques, emphasizing that effective reconciliation requires confronting a multitude of questions concerning justice, the return of displaced populations, property rights, and the integration of armed groups. These issues are crucial for mending the fragmented Syrian society and state.

The authors suggests leveraging historical wisdom, like that of Ibn Hazm Al-Andalusi, who recognized the inevitability of criticism in public service, to encourage today's intellectuals to engage courageously in necessary dialogues. Such dialogues should not be hampered by idealism but should remain grounded in the harsh realities Syrians face, including the ongoing conflict and its deep social divisions.

The article stresses that dialogue is indispensable for reconciliation and should not be seen as an admission of defeat but as a proactive step towards collective healing and rebuilding. It must be inclusive, involving all parties, including those controlling territories and resources. Excluding significant stakeholders only perpetuates conflict and hinders the establishment of a shared vision for Syria’s future.

Further, the piece highlights the importance of international and regional support in facilitating Syrian-led dialogues, which are crucial for developing practical and inclusive strategies for peace. Such efforts should align with international frameworks like UN Resolution 2254, yet be driven by Syrian needs and perspectives.

In essence, the article advocates for a sustained and inclusive national dialogue, viewing it as the only viable path to a reconciled and unified Syria. This process requires breaking down longstanding stereotypes and initiating tough but necessary conversations to foster a sense of national unity and purpose, thereby preventing further fragmentation and conflict.